A recent article by an Italian journalist Giuseppe Mancini in al-Monitor caught my attention earlier this week. He says,
Hierapolis is the most popular archaelogical site in Turkey, with its peak of 2 million tourists in 2014 and a comparable number anticipated for 2018. In fact, most of them — largely Russians on day trips from Antalya — see only the natural features of the place: the white cascades of travertine created by thermal waters flowing downhill. The venue is better known in Turkish as Pamukkale, literally the “cotton castle,” whose light blue natural pools are featured in every tourism brochure.
Mancini discusses the archaeological work done by Italian scholars. In 2011 they were convinced that they had located the tomb of Philip the Apostle (Matthew 10:3). He laments that most of the tourists visit only a limited area of Pamukkale.
Few tourists walk the paved roads among the ruins or sit in the well-preserved theater. Fewer still are adventurous enough to climb the steep hill overlooking Pamukkale and Hierapolis — guides apparently advise against going there — where the Christian St. Philip the Apostle was killed, buried and venerated for many centuries.
I have observed the same thing and understand the reasons. (1) The tomb of Philip is an archaeological site. (2) It is a relatively long distance from the cascades, pools, and shops. (3) Tour groups are limited in time and (4) the greater number of tour members would not take time to visit a site like this. Let me show you.
You will be able to see the buildings dedicated to Philip right of the center of the photo on the top of the hill. First you get to walk on ruins of an ancient road.
But that is not all. Next you must climb these steps to a plateau near the tomb and complex of buildings.
When you think you have almost arrived, you see steep steps that must be climbed to the plateau where the Martyrium is located.
Then you come to the ruins of the church where pilgrims came to honor Philip.
There is another building of significance at the site. It is an octagonal building said to have been where Philip was martyred. Only the strongest portions of the building stand.
Fant and Reddish say,
The martyrium was apparently used neither as a church (no altar has been found) nor as a burial site (no tomb has been found) but rather served as a place for processions and special services in honor of the saint. (A Guide to Biblical Sites in Greece and Turkey, p. 215).
According to Fatih Cimok these building were destroyed by fire in the 6th century and never rebuilt (Biblical Anatolia, p 160).
A number of crosses are found at the site engraved on various stones. Cimok says,
Inscriptions speak of “the people of the Jews,” “the settlement of the Jews who dwell in Hierapolis,” and “The archives of the Jews.” (Ibid.)
There is much more to see at Hierapolis, including a small but nice museum. Perhaps at a later time I will show you the Hellenistic Theater, the street and arch dedicated to Emperor Domitian, and some of the elaborate tombs. In fact, some have been discussed before. You may locate the posts by typing Hierapolis or Pamukkale in the Search Box.
Resources: In addition to sources cited here, I cited Mark Wilson’s Biblical Turkey in the previous post. These are wonderful resources to use in preparation for a trip to Turkey.
Pingback: The Arch of Domitian at Hierapolis | Ferrell's Travel Blog
Pingback: links to 4 helpful articles – preachersmith
Dr. Jenkins – I’ve been writing a Bible study series, called The Women of the Word (WOW) Series and wrote a lesson about the daughters of Philip the evangelist who were ‘prophetesses’ in the early church…. (i.e., not Philip the apostle) and this question was in the lesson:
“During the early days of the Apostolic Church, Asia Minor, (today’s modern Turkey) was among the first mission territories targeted by the apostles. In fact, all seven of the local churches mentioned in the Book of Revelation⎯ Ephesus, Smyrna, Pergamum, Thyatira, Sardis, Philadelphia, and Laodicea⎯were located in this region of the Roman Empire. The writings of the early Church Fathers say that the family of Philip eventually migrated from Caesarea to Hierapolis near Colossae. In a letter to Pope St. Victor (c. 190 A.D.), Polycrates (c. 130–196 A.D.), the bishop of Ephesus, refers to “Philip, one of the Twelve Apostles, who is buried in Hieropolis with his two daughters, who grew old as virgins.” Polycrates also mentions a third daughter, who “led a life in the Holy Spirit and rests in Ephesus.” Another church father, Eusebius (c. 260–340 A.D.) tells of a dialogue of Caius in which Proclus speaks: After this there were four prophetesses the daughters of Philip at Hierapolis in Asia, whose tomb, and that of their father, are to be seen there. Church tradition holds that Philip was martyred in Hierapolis around 80 A.D.”…. with this footnote:
“Caution should be taken to correctly identify the Philip figure who is being identified in the literature since Philip is the name of one of the apostles of Jesus (Matthew 10:3; Mark 3:18; Luke 6:3; John 1:43-44, Acts 1:13) and also the name of a different man, Philip the Evangelist, who had the four daughters who prophesied (Acts 6:5; 8:5, 12-13, 26, 28-31; 21:8).”
Dr. Jenkins, I read your blog — thanks so much for many interesting ‘travels’ with you.
Could you tell me if you think there is conflated information about the burial site of Philip the apostle and Philip the evangelist? Your thoughts?
Thanks very much!
Dr. Nancy Dawson